THE EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF ART: FROM THE SYSTEM OF FINE ARTS TO MODERN AESTHETICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59864/sam110105ODKeywords:
concept of art, fine arts, mimesis, comparative aesthetics, abstract art, representation, autonomy of artAbstract
This paper explores the historical evolution and transformation of the concept of art from the Renaissance and the Enlightenment to the era of Modernism and contemporary aesthetic theories. The first section analyzes the gradual establishment of the "system of fine arts," tracing its roots from the early notions found in the works of Francesco da Hollanda and François Blondel, through the definitive conceptualization in Charles Batteux’s 1747 treatise, to the autonomy of art formulated by Friedrich Schiller. The study highlights a modern paradox: while the Classical and Medieval concept of art—grounded in craftsmanship and rules—was clear and easily definable, the contemporary concept of art, burdened by subjectivism and pluralism, evades universal definitions. The second section shifts focus toward the methodological framework of comparative art analysis (drawing on the contributions of V. Panić and M. Ranković) and the recontextualization of the ancient concept of mimesis. It addresses the problem of representation within twentieth-century abstract art, contrasting and synthesizing the theoretical perspectives of Giulio Carlo Argan and Rosalind Krauss. Conclusively, the paper examines the relationship between perception, visual models of reality, and epistemology, emphasizing that contemporary art transforms mimesis from mere imitation and replication toward a complex system of reference and subjective expression.
Downloads
References
Argan, G. C. (1982). Studije o modernoj umetnosti [Studies on Modern Art] (N. Stipčević, Trans.). Nolit.
Batteux, C. (1747). Les beaux arts réduits à un même principe [The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle].
Blondel, F. (1675). Cours d’architecture enseigné dans l'Académie Royale d'Architecture [Architecture Course Taught at the Royal Academy of Architecture].
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (S. Pleasance & F. Woods, Trans.). Les Presses du Réel.
Białostocki, J. (1982). Povijest povijesti umjetnosti [History of Art History] (V. Maleković, Trans.). Mladost.
Panić, V. (1999). Aksiologika [Axiology]. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Groys, B. (2008). Art power. MIT Press.
Krauss, R. E. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. MIT Press.
Lalande, A. (1926). Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie [Technical and Critical Dictionary of Philosophy]. Félix Alcan.
Ranković, M. (1973). Komparativna estetika [Comparative Aesthetics]. Umetnička akademija u Beogradu.
Runes, D. D. (Ed.). (1942). The dictionary of philosophy. Philosophical Library.
Schiller, F. (1962). Letter to Körner from February 23, 1793. In Schillers Werke: Nationalausgabe (Vol. 26, p. 245).
Steyerl, H. (2012). The wretched of the screen. Sternberg Press.
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1980). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics (C. A. Kisiel, Trans.). Polish Scientific Publishers.
Vuković, D. (2016). Primer komparativne analize učeničkog likovnog rada i umetničkog dela [An Example of Comparative Analysis of a Student's Artwork and a Work of Art]. Uzdanica, 13(2), 217–230.